Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

La politique agricole commune après 2013. Les enjeux et la position des acteurs

Bibliographic Data

ID3921428
AuthorsJean-Christophe Bureau, Jean‐Christophe Bureau (Economie Publique, corresponding author)
Year2010
Issue369
Pages45-61
Publication date2010-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFuturibles (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0337-307X • E-ISSN: 1958-5764
PublisherCAIRN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1051/futur/36945
OpenAlexW2005624952
LanguageFR
Citations received1

This article by Jean-Christophe Bureau, the second strand in Futuribles’s dossier on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), outlines the issues raised by that policy and the main European actors involved (states, environmental organizations, farming unions etc.). Bemoaning the fact that, in a context of rising world agricultural demand and intensified action on environmental matters, debate on the essential issues raised by the CAP has so far been too superficial, J.-C. Bureau begins by looking back over how we arrived at this situation. He indicates the path which, from 1992 onwards, led the European Council to reform the CAP, in an attempt to end what had become a structural mismatch between the supply and demand of agricultural produce, and describes the growing trend (with the reforms of 2003 and 2008) to vest responsibility for the management of agricultural subsidies in the member states. He goes on to present the positions of the main states concerned, together with a certain number of proposals advanced by non-governmental organizations or think-tanks in respect of the next stage, which is set to begin in 2013. These involve emphasizing “public goods” and encouraging the agricultural sector to act positively in environmental matters, rather than granting support centred exclusively on production or agricultural prices. Lastly, Bureau identifies a number of possible ways forward for the CAP after 2013 in an unprecedented institutional context in which the European Parliament has a greater role, to the detriment of the Council and the European Commission. With some advocating a return to market regulation and others believing such a policy belongs to the past, while yet others wish to put an end to direct subsidy altogether (or to change its form); with differences of perspective between new and old members of the Union; and with countries where the agricultural sector is almost non-existent figuring alongside others where the economy is largely based on that sector, there is a danger of the debate degenerating into chaos. Can we really hope for an ambitious reform to emerge?

Humanities · Political science · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · Philosophy

  • La notion de « biens publics » au secours de la Politique Agricole Commune

    Open Access•François-Gaël Lataste, Aurélie Trouvé et al.•Développement durable et…•2015

Citations per year0.09
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae