Traditional Medicine Goes Global
Pan-African Precedents, Cultural Decolonization, and Cold War Rights/Properties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3924661 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helen Tilley (0000-0002-9524-546X, Interactive Research and Development, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Pages | 132-159 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Osiris (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0369-7827 • E-ISSN: 1933-8287 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/714329 |
| OpenAlex | W3178584574 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 20 |
The concept of traditional medicine, for all its multifaceted roots, achieved global prominence only during the Cold War era in the wake of massive decolonization. While developments within Asia contributed to this shift, it was often leaders and diplomats from newly independent African countries who first put different aspects of traditional medicine forward for debate within United Nations agencies. The Organization of African Unity (OAU), along with several other pan-African initiatives, paved the way for this work, tying the continent’s cultural heritage to its medical heritage and pushing for its “cultural property” to be protected as intellectual property. These goals were both precedent setting and inherently fraught: they gave states more tacit power to act as gatekeepers for those labeled “traditional healers” (who often referred to themselves by different terms entirely and had ambivalent relationships to state authorities). Diplomats also promoted an ethos that endogenous experts’ “know-how” was a public good and the preserve of governments, rather than private capital. This article reconstructs a central strand in the story of how traditional medicine went global, paying special attention to pan-African networks’ radical foreign policy agendas. These ultimately ensured that global institutions, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), opened their doors to polyglot therapeutics (or different conceptual schemas to define health and illness) and promoted the idea that heterodox healers were integral to people’s rights to health. Though pan-African initiatives were unable to overturn deeply entrenched power imbalances or enact their full agenda, they did have lasting legal, policy, and epistemic effects that continue to reverberate around the world to this day
Ethos · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Public Administration · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Balancing the books
Group Ownership, Group Interests, and the Ethics of Cultural Exchange
Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influence 2023
In the shadow of the healing rainbow
From desired futures to market realities
Enacting a depoliticised alterity
Traditional Healing and Law in Contemporary Senegal
Applied anthropology, injustice, and the ethics of intervention
Healing the Masses
The Hegemony of Growth
The World Health Organization
Foreign Intervention in Africa
The Politics of Heritage in Africa
Flickering Fault Lines
Unesco and African Historiography
A Report On the Pan-African Cultural Festival
The OAU’s Administrative Secretary-General
The 1967 Central Intelligence Agency Scandal
The Activist State
Articulate(d) bodies
Beyond Négritude
The Values of Versatility
The political life of the dead Lumumba
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |