Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Competition and Crisis in Mid-Republican Rome

Bibliographic Data

ID3938144
AuthorsNathan Rosenstein (corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume47
Issue4
Pages313
Publication date1993-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhoenix (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8299 • E-ISSN: 1929-4883
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1088728
OpenAlexW2323684962
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited1

ARISTOCRATIC COMPETITION lay at the heart of the Roman Republic. No professional bureaucracy directed public affairs; no salary accompanied political office. Instead, the city harnessed individual ambition to meet its essential needs. Contention among the ruling elite for glory and renown, for public offices, and for the honor, rank, and authority that attended them regulated Rome's markets and built its roads, saw to the worship of the gods, crafted laws, led the city's armies and conducted its foreign affairs. These struggles were vital to the success of the res publica. Yet what aristocratic competition could serve it could also subvert. The pursuit of success at any cost or in any manner or even at the wrong moment could bring aristocratic ambition into conflict with the vital interests of the Republic. Limits were essential-but what were they and how did they work? In the ceaseless rivalry of a small group of highly contentious men within an increasingly wealthy and potent imperial city, how could the Republic's vital interests be defined and means be found to curb ambition when the two clashed? No authority existed outside the senatorial class to make such determinations and exert the necessary compulsion; the impetus would have to come from within. Yet the aristocracy's own closely-knit and semi-exclusive character ensured that many if not most of its members would be highly partisan observers of any political contest the outcome of which would in some way affect their aspirations and interests or those of relatives and friends. How then were they able to impose limits on themselves? War perhaps afforded an easy and obvious means of doing so. Military

Biology · Competition (biology · Political science · Classical Antiquity Studies

  • Elephants and Citizens

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Kings and Elephants

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Looking at Caesar

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Afterword

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Looking at the Powerful

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • The Affections of the Athenians

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Ciceronian Consensus

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • The Administration of the Imperium Romanum in the Second Century bce

    Michele Bellomo•Community in Transition•2022

  • Frugality as a Political Language in the Second Century BCE

    Open Access•Laure Passet•Roman Frugality•2020

  • Spectacular Power in the Greek and Roman City

    Andrew Bell, Andrew J Bell•Spectacular power in the Greek…•2004

  • Poder popular e expansão da república romana, 200-150 a.C

    Open Access•Rafael Scopacasa•Topoi (Rio de Janeiro•2018

  • Samothracian Influences at Rome

    Maggie L Popkin•American Journal of Archaeology•2015

  • Candidates Defeated in Roman Elections

    T Robert S Broughton•Transactions of the American…•1991

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,55
Citation span2004 - 2022 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae