The Trauma Risk Management Approach to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in the British Military
Masculinity, Biopolitics and Depoliticisation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3945637 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harriet Gray (0000-0001-7702-1959, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 109-123 |
| Publication date | 2015-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-7789 • E-ISSN: 1466-4380 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/fr.2015.23 |
| OpenAlex | W896095923 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 34 |
This paper discusses the political implications of the British military's Trauma Risk Management (TRiM) approach to personnel suffering from combat-related mental debilities such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Drawing on narratives that emerged from qualitative interviews with trained TRiM practitioners and military welfare workers, I tease out some of the assumptions and beliefs about mental health and mental illness that underpin this mental health intervention programme. I explore TRiM as a biopolitical strategy targeted towards the construction of a particular conceptualisation of mental wellness and militarised masculine personhood. As a biopolitical strategy, I argue that TRiM plays an important role in the construction of ideas around mental well-being and mental frailty that best enable the operation of military power in the contemporary British context. I discuss the narrative of transformation in militarised models of masculinity that emerge from discussions of TRiM, and highlight the important political function that this plays in enabling and legitimating militarism. Finally, I draw attention to the ways in which the focus on individual and cultural factors, rather than war as the primary cause of difficulties for servicemen experiencing psychological distress, functions to neutralise the potential trouble that could be instigated for the British military by the bodies of servicemen psychologically damaged by their experiences of conflict
Biopower · Masculinity · Mental distress · Mental health · Militarism · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Sociology · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research · Psychology
What Can We/Do We Want to Know? Reflections from Researching SGBV in Military Settings
Breaking Ranks
Unconquerable Heroes
Incarcerated Young Men, Masculinity, and Trauma
Medication by Proxy
The biopolitics of masculinity (studies)
A pacifist critique of the red poppy
Holly Furneaux, Military men of feeling
Buddy Watch
Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mental Health Problems, and Barriers to Care
Discipline and Punish
Madness in International Relations
Trauma and the Memory of Politics
Gulf War Syndrome
Bananas, Beaches and Bases
Helmetcams, militarized sensation and 'Somatic War
If no means no, does yes mean yes? Consenting to research intimacies
The Demise of PTSD
Preventing psychological trauma in soldiers
Bananas, beaches and bases
Frames of war
Resilience, war, and austerity
Discipline and Punish
The Afghan War and 'postmodern' memory
The military covenant and the civil-military contract in Britain
The Geopolitics of Intimacy and the Intimacies of Geopolitics
Domesticating military masculinities
Ex-Servicemen on the Road
Exploring the ambiguities of masculinity in accounts of emotional distress in the military among young ex-servicemen
Madness and Civilization
Madness and Civilisation
Hegemonic Masculinity
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2023 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |