Conflicting Interests
The British and Irish Suffrage Movements
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3946100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margaret Ward (0000-0001-9903-446X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 127-147 |
| Publication date | 1995-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-7789 • E-ISSN: 1466-4380 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1395496 |
| OpenAlex | W3142642838 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 6 |
This article uses a case-study of the relationship between the British suffrage organization, the Women's Social and Political Union, and its equivalent on the Irish side, the Irish Women's Franchise League, in order to illuminate some consequences of the colonial relationship between Britain and Ireland. As political power was located within the British state, and the British feminist movement enjoyed superior resources, the Irish movement was at a disadvantage. This was compounded by serious internal divisions within the Irish movement - a product of the dispute over Ireland's constitutional future - which prevented the Franchise League, sympathetic to the nationalist demand for independence - from establishing a strong presence in the North. The consequences of the British movement organizing in Ireland, in particular their initiation of a militant campaign in the North, are explored in some detail, using evidence provided by letters from the participants. British intervention was clearly motivated from British-inspired concerns rather than from any solidarity with the situation of women in Ireland, proving to be disastrous for the Irish, accentuating their deep-rooted divisions. The overall argument is that feminism cannot be viewed in isolation from other political considerations. This case-study isolates the repercussions of Britain's imperial role for both British and Irish movements: ostensibly with a common objective but in reality divided by their differing response to the constitutional arrangement between the two countries. For this reason, historians of Irish feminist movements must give consideration to the importance of the 'national question' and display a more critical attitude towards the role played by Britain in Irish affairs
Colonialism · Feminism · Home rule · Human sexuality · Irish · Militant · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social movement · Sociology · Solidarity · Suffrage · Anthropology · Cultural Studies · Gender Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Irish and British Studies · Law
Hlas tradície / Katolícka jednota žien a podpora antimodernizmu na Slovensku v rokoch 1920-1948
Self-determination, race, and empire
‘Political conditions in wales are quite different …’ party politics and votes for women in Wales, 1912–15 1
Divided sisterhood? Nationalist feminism and feminist militancy in England and Ireland
A double claim to be consulted’
Constance Markievicz's allegorical garden
You Have Votes and Power
Gender, Nationality and Cultural Representations of Ireland
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,35 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2025 (26) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |