Micro-Geopolitics
Capitalising Security in Laos's Golden Quadrangle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3948371 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maggie Dwyer (0000-0002-5500-9382, Center for International Forestry Research, corresponding author), Michael B Dwyer |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 377-405 |
| Publication date | 2014-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geopolitics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1465-0045 • E-ISSN: 1557-3028 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14650045.2013.780033 |
| OpenAlex | W2044996225 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 42 |
Enclosure, dispossession and displacement loom large in current debates about the recent boom in transnational farmland deals, and about Chinese agribusiness for export in particular. Often under-examined, however, are the ways that legacies of geopolitical conflict shape the inevitably uneven distribution of enclosure, dispossession and displacement. This paper constructs a case of these ‘micro-geopolitical’ legacies by examining a Chinese rubber planting ‘promotion’ project in northwestern Laos’s emerging ‘Golden Quadrangle’ development region. It argues that longstanding concerns about security inform the ways that local authorities deploy investment projects that are otherwise seen as examples of ‘foreign’ land grabbing. Further, it shows that while the geographical aims of foreign agribusiness mesh with state-mediated resettlement efforts (a darker spin on the narrative of ‘win-win’ cooperation), these activities often precede current land deals rather than result from them. Chinese agribusiness in Laos’s upland interior thus appears less as a driver of displacement than a means for attempting to secure in place a particular (if precarious) configuration of population and security
Archaeology · Geography · Geopolitics · Political science · Politics · Quadrangle · Global trade and economics · Law · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
From Booms to Bans
Land-use change in a telecoupled world
Staying or Moving
Civil-Military Relations in Southeast Asia
Poverty trends in villages affected by land-based investments in rural Laos
Great expectations
The long land grab
The Outsourcing of State Security
Peripheral centers
Grounding Chinese investment
Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials
Crop booms at the forest frontier
Circular labor migration and land-livelihood dynamics in Southeast Asia's concession landscapes
Ambiguous spaces, empirical traces
Making concessions pay? Historical vs. potential tax revenues from Laos’s rubber sector
Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below
Institutional bricolage and the (Re)shaping of communal land tenure arrangements
Land grabs and labour
Changing local land systems
The cooperation‐infrastructure nexus
Rubber out of the ashes
Reconfiguring Frontier Spaces
The Whole World Is Watching
The security exception
Transcending banana investments
Livelihoods and coping strategies of local communities on previous customary land in limbo of commercial agricultural development
A conceptual framework for improving the understanding of large scale land acquisitions
Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications
Revealing the hidden effects of land grabbing through better understanding of farmers’ strategies in dealing with land loss
Conspicuous consumption behavior of land-lost farmers
State Spaces of Resistance
Relations of sovereignty
Nontraditional security and China's transnational narcotics control in northern Laos and Myanmar
Conservation as counterinsurgency
They will not automatically benefit
Political geographies of urban demarcation
Criminalized crops
Neoliberalizing Authoritarian Environmental Governance in (Post)Socialist Laos
Governing Dispossession
Transition From Subsistence Agriculture to Rubber Plantations in Northern Laos
What happened when the land grab came to Southeast Asia
Tapping into rubber
| Unique citing works | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 38 |