Reichling and De Groot
Two Dutch reactions to Bühler'sOrganon-Modell
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3954898 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Els Elffers-Van Ketel (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 87-116 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Historiographia Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/hl.32.1-2.05elf |
| OpenAlex | W4249620515 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Dutch structuralism developed during the first half of the 20th century as a heterogeneous movement. Interest in the works of Karl Bühler (1879-1963), however, can be observed in the publications of Dutch linguists as different as Albert Willem de Groot (1892-1963) and Anton Reichling (1898-1986), professors of General Linguistics at the universities of, respectively, Utrecht and Amsterdam. Although the ways in which they discuss and make use of Bühler's insights differ widely, in agreement with their very divergent theoretical orientations, there is one common element: both scholars discovered and criticized, independently of each other, the same ambiguity in the famous organon-model, presented by Bühler in his Sprachtheorie (1934
Ambiguity · Epistemology · Humanities · Linguistics · Structuralism (philosophy of science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistic research and analysis · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|