Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theodor Bibliander (1504-1564) and the Languages of Japheth's Progeny

Bibliographic Data

ID3954933
AuthorsGeorge J Metcalf (SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA, corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume7
Issue3
Pages323-333
Publication date1980-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistoriographia Linguistica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/hl.7.3.02met
OpenAlexW2015628407
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

Theodor Bibliander (1504-1564) was an important link in developing the concept of the language family that is now called Indo-European. 'Lector' for the Greek of the Septuagint at the Münsterschule in Zürich (Zwingli's successor), Bibliander had early showed aptitude for languages and had devoted himself particularly to Hebrew and related Semitic tongues. As exegete he interpreted the events at Babel (Genesis 10, 11) from the perspective of this knowledge. The 'confounding' of language, although it had occurred suddenly, still permitted the resulting languages to show kinship on the order of dialect variations. Thus the descendants of Shem, settling compactly in the vicinity, still gave striking evidence of their close-knit linguistic consanguinity. But the surviving evidence was not so obvious for the descendants of Japheth, who had scattered over Europe as part of God's plan to populate the earth. Like all languages, these languages too were subject to inevitable change, an inescapable quality of all human institutions. Yet a closer look could still discern this relationship, as evidenced, for instance, in Greek (stemming from Javan), German-(ic) (stemming from Gomer), and Slavic (stemming from Magog). Bibliander's study of Hebrew had sharpened his sensitivity to the inner structure of the word and to the processes of inflection and derivation, which were manifestations of the ratio which underlay all languages, even 'barbarian'. Bibliander chose as his examples to prove the 'Japhetic' relationship parallel Greek and German affixes. Although not all of his examples stand the test of modern etymology, the procedure remains exemplary, and helped to give credence to the belief in the existence of a 'Japhetic' or 'European' family of languages

Ancient history · Art · Barbarian · Etymology · German · Hebrew · Inflection · Linguistics · Literature · Semitic languages · Slavic languages · Classics · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy

  • Problematic metaphors for the temporality of languages

    Maurice Olender•Intellectual History Review•2023

  • Die biblischen Vorlesungen Theodor Biblianders in einer Abschrift seines Bruders Heinrich Bibliander

    Open Access•Ernst Staehelin•Zwingliana•2010

  • A 17th-Century Demonstration of Language Relationship

    John Eros, John F Eros•Historiographia Linguistica•1976

  • Studies in the History of Linguistics. Traditions and Paradigms

    Rosane Rocher, Dell Hymes•Journal of the American Oriental…•1977

  • Andreas Kempe (1622-89) and the Languages Spoken in Paradise

    Claes-Christian Elert•Historiographia Linguistica•1978

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae