Are we all saussureans now
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3955026 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George Wolf (University of New Orleans, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 359-377 |
| Publication date | 2000-10-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Historiographia Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/hl.27.2.12wol |
| OpenAlex | W1973183376 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This paper addresses the question whether all of the most important linguistic theories of the 20th century are Saussurean. Beginning with Engler's observation that there are so many interpretive possibilities in the Saussurean material which has appeared that it is even possible for opposing viewpoints to be Saussurean, the discussion ranges over European and American theorists from Bloomfield to Roy Harris, and questions to what extent each followed the Genevan master
Art · Epistemology · Viewpoints · Gender Studies in Language · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Hume's philosophy and hair distribution · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|