Misquoting the ancients

The Kangxi zidian 康熙字典 [Kangxi Dictionary] was without doubt the most influential and widely used dictionary in China during the past three centuries, and its impact on education, scholarship, and intellectual life in general, cannot be overstated. The dictionary's compilation was a major step in the development of Chinese lexicography, and it has been at the foundation of all large dictionary projects ever since. This paper addresses the editors' tendency to misquote and misattribute quotations, which has been among the most commonly criticized issues. My aim here is not to identify further mistakes but to document the patterns of misquotations, as these can help understand the process of the dictionary's compilation. One noteworthy find is that in many cases members of the editorial team quoted their sources indirectly, relying on more recent encyclopedias and miscellanea

Art · Chinese history and philosophy · Philosophy

• Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature (vol. 3 & 4)

  David R Knechtges, Taiping Chang•Ancient and Early Medieval…•2014

  Añadir item

• Angelo Zottoli, a Jesuit Missionary in China (1848 to 1902)

  Open Access•Antonio De, Antonio De Caro•Angelo Zottoli, a Jesuit…•2022

  Añadir item

• Introduction to the study of the Chinese characters

  Joseph Edkins, Charles Lang Freer•Introduction to the study of the…•1876

  Añadir item

• Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period, 1644-1912 (2 vols)

  C K Yang, Library of Congress Orientalia Division et al.•Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period•2010

  Añadir item

• Once again, the Authorship of the Hsi-Ching Tsa-Chi (Miscellanies of the Western Capital)

  William H Nienhauser•Journal of the American Oriental…•1978

  Añadir item

• A remarkable compilation shift

  Rui Li, Annette Skovsted Hansen•Historiographia Linguistica•2018

  Añadir item

• Preferring Omission over Falsity

  Nathan Vedal•Historiographia Linguistica•2013

  Añadir item