My imperfect attempt towards an English Grammar

Lowth’s indebtedness to James Harris in revising his grammar

Bibliographic Data

ID3955480
AuthorsIngrid Tieken-Boon Van Ostade (0000-0003-4362-6188, Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume39
Issue1
Pages61-75
Publication date2012-04-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistoriographia Linguistica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/hl.39.1.05tie
OpenAlexW1985112536
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

This article provides an analysis of the only evidence that has - to the author's knowledge - come down to us of the correspondence between the most authoritative 18th-century English grammarian Robert Lowth (1710-1787) and James Harris (1709-1780), author of the philosophical grammar Hermes (1751). The two extant letters uniquely provide insight into Lowth's views on the pedagogical function of his grammar, on the innovatory aspect of his critical footnotes, and on some of the doubts and uncertainties he experienced while writing his grammar. All this adds to the radically different view of Lowth as a grammarian presented in The Bishop's Grammar (Tieken-Boon van Ostade 2011), while the article also throws light on Lowth's attempts at establishing a more private relationship with the author of one of the most important works within the wider 18th-century English grammatical tradition

Art · Epistemology · Extant taxon · Grammar · Imperfect · Linguistics · Literature · Sociology · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub