Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mentalism and beyond in Buddhist Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID3962124
AuthorsHerbert V Guenther (corresponding author)
Year1966
Volume86
Issue3
Pages297
Publication date1966-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/597037
OpenAlexW2320262621
LanguageEN

cated to Astarte because of any political or military event-in fact, line 6 would imply just the opposite. Many of the details which Garbini cites to establish a philological connection between Caere and Carthage are simply not cogent; thus his argument about the opening dedicatory formula and about the cult of Astarte at Carthage really prove nothing one way or the other. Among earlier commentators on the text S. Moscati sensed the Phoenician character of the text, but could only bring himself to describe it as fenicio-punica. A. Dupont-Sommer, M. Dahood, P. Nober, and J.-G. Fevrier were content to follow Garbini's designation of it as Punic. Only J. Ferron came out clearly for its Phoenician character. Though we disagree with most of his interpretation of the text, nevertheless in this respect we tend to agree with him.'2

Buddhism · Buddhist philosophy · Epistemology · Theology · Chinese history and philosophy · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae