Words for "Printing Block" and the Origin of Printing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3963933 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Shafer, Robert E Shafer (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1960 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 328 |
| Publication date | 1960-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/595881 |
| OpenAlex | W2333630443 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
THE CONCLUSION THAT PRINTING originated in China has not seriously been questioned. The Orientalist, Berthold Laufer, concluded that Tibetan par block was derived from Chinese pana (Laufer's transcription).2 Laufer was no doubt influenced by the current idea that printing originated in China. But later research makes Laufer's conclusion quite impossible. First we must notice that Tibetan par is a modern form. Laufer remarked that Over the
3D printing · Block (permutation group theory) · Composite material · Geometry · Computer Science · Materials Science · Mathematics · Media, Communication, and Education
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,02 |
| Citation span | 1968 - 1968 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |