The Origins of the Tiandihui
The Chinese Triads in Legend and History
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3965234 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel L Overmyer |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 708 |
| Publication date | 1995-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | REVIEW |
| Review of | The Origins of the Tiandihui: The Chinese Triads in Legend and History, Dian H Murray, 1994 |
| Venue | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/604757 |
| OpenAlex | W2022658559 |
| Language | EN |
The Tiandihui, also known as the Heaven and Earth Association or the Triads, was one of the earliest, largest, and most enduring of the Chinese secret societies that have played crucial roles at decisive junctures in modern Chinese history. These organizations were characterized by ceremonial rituals, often in the form of blood oaths, that brought people together for a common goal. Some were organized for clandestine, criminal, or even seditious purposes by people alienated from or at the margins of society. Others were organized for mutual protection or the administration of local activities by law-abiding members of a given community. The common perception in the twentieth century, both in China and in the West, was that the Tiandihui was founded by Chinese patriots in the seventeenth century for the purpose of overthrowing the Qing (Manchu) dynasty and restoring the Ming (Chinese). This view was put forward by Sun Yat-sen and other revolutionaries who claimed that, like the anti-Manchu founders of the Tiandihui, their goal was to strip the Manchus of their throne. The Chinese Nationalists (Guomindang) today claim the Tiandihui as part of their heritage. This book relates a very different history of the origins of the Tiandihui. Using Qing dynasty archives that were made available in both Beijing and Taipei during the last decades, the author shows that the Tiandihui was founded not as a political movement but as a mutual aid brotherhood in 1761, a century after the date given by traditional historiography. She contends that histories depicting Ming loyalism as the raison d'etre of the Tiandihui are based on internally generated sources and, in part, on the Lu Legend, a creation myth that tells of monks from the Shaolin Monastery aiding the emperor in fighting the Xi Lu barbarians. Because of its importance to the theories of Ming loyalist scholars and its impact on Tiandihui historiography as a whole, the author thoroughly investigates the legend, revealing it to be the product of later - not founding - generations of Tiandihui members and a tale with an evolution of its own. The seven extant versions of the legend itself appear in English translation as an appendix. This book thus accomplishes three things: it reviews and analyzes the extensive Tiandihui literature; it makes available to Western scholars information from archival materials heretofore seen only by a few Chinese specialists; and it firmly establishes an authoritative chronology of the Tiandihui's early history
Ancient history · Archaeology · Legend · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Japanese History and Culture · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Martial Sound
Italian Organised Crime
The Trouble with Millenarianism
Chinese Transnationalism in Britain
Opium and the Origins of Treason in Modern China
Hard Labor and Hostile Encounters
Righteous Brothers and Demon Slayers
Performing Exclusion and Resistance
Recent Chinese Scholarship on the History of Chinese Secret Societies
State Building before 1644
The Ch'ien-lung Reign
The Social Roles of Literati in Early to Mid-Ch'ing
The Yung-cheng Reign
Social Stability and Social Change
Academia Encounters the Chinese Martial Arts
Economic Developments, 1644–1800
Gods, Ghosts, and Gangsters
Between the gift and the market
The speech-act offence
The Heaven and Earth Society as Popular Religion
Rebellion, crime and violence in Qing China, 1722-1911
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |