Bukhārī and Early Hadith Criticism
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3965333 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christopher Melchert (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2001 |
| Volume | 121 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 7 |
| Data de publicação | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Editora | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/606725 |
| OpenAlex | W2318334498 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
Norman Calder has questioned the attribution of al-Ta⊃rīkh al-kabir to al-Bukhārī (d. 256/870). Quotations from Ibn Abi Hātim al-Rāzī and al-Khatib al-Baghdādī, together with comparisons among the rijāl works of Bukhari, suggest that al-Ta⊃rīkh al-kabir was one of Bukhari's last works, subject to some correction and rearrangement after his death. It cannot have been retrospectively derived from Bukhari's Sahih, as Calder thought, yet neither can it have been the basis of the Sahīh, for it omits to mention fourteen percent of the men in the Sahīh and mentions personal evaluations of only six percent of all its subjects. Its principal function seems to have been to identify traditionists by name. Inasmuch as it bespeaks sole reliance on isnad analysis to sort strong and weak reports, al-Ta⊃rīkh al-kabīr may represent a particular Khurasani tendency in hadith criticism. More certainly, it represents the professionalization of hadith science as against the amateurism evident behind Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-⊂Ilal wa-ma⊂rifat al-rijāl
Criticism · Political science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2008 - 2021 (14) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |