Brahui and the Zagrosian Hypothesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3966967 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David W Mcalpin (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Publisher | American Oriental Society (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7817/jameroriesoci.135.3.551 |
| OpenAlex | W2750907434 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This paper is an extension of McAlpin (2003) and follows the same conventions I used there, particularly for the citations of Kurux. My earlier monograph (McAlpin 1981) is, at this point, largely out-of-date, not so much wrong as bypassed by more complete sources and better argumentation. However, the portion on the velars, PED *k, is completely mistaken and is superseded by this article. The underlying assumption that we understood Proto-Dravidian phonology proved premature. The separation of the old velars into palatals, velars, and uvulars has had a major impact on the comparative statements. This paper is restricted to the dorsal consonants (palatals, velars, uvulars) and their immediate extensions. This is primarily because this information is new, but it also keeps the body of data small enough that a complete set of the data can be presented in a reasonably sized paper
Argumentation theory · Extension (predicate logic) · Geometry · Linguistics · Point (geometry) · Set (abstract data type) · Archaeological and Historical Studies · Computer Science · Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |