Logic, Language, and Grammar in Early China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3967508 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William G Boltz, Christoph Harbsmeier |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 120 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 218 |
| Publication date | 2000-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/605025 |
| OpenAlex | W2316069420 |
| Language | EN |
In examining what he calls the logical features and logical concepts of the Classical Chinese language Christoph Harbsmeier has shown in this volume of Science and Civilisation in China that logic is logic and that, like mathematics, physics, and chemistry, for example, logic in China is no different from logic in the West in its primary, fundamental nature. Whatever differences there may appear to be are secondary matters of how logical propositions are expressed in the language and of the accidental fact of the particular concerns of extant texts. An analysis of the logical features of Classical Chinese becomes a useful and revealing part of a comparative study of grammar in Classical Chinese and in the principal Western classical languages, Greek and Latin, and in English. Grammars may differ ; the meanings of words and of syntactic constructions may differ, and as a consequence logical propositions may appear to be formulated in different ways in Chinese and English (or other Western languages), but the underlying premises and conclusions of logical reasoning are language independent, and the logical features of the Classical Chinese language reflect linguistic universals
China · Grammar · Linguistics · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |