Zoopolis
A Political Theory of Animal Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3969953 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stanley Shostak |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 283-284 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2014.876242 |
| OpenAlex | W1999079861 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka assert that animal advocacy has hit “roadblocks to progressive change” (1) due to inadequate “moral frameworks: a ‘welfarist’ approach, an ‘ecological’ approach, and
Animal ethics · Animal rights · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethical theory · Law and economics · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy
Benefitting Nonhuman Animals with AI
What do we owe to intelligent robots
Signs of Invisibility
Closer kinships
To live and die in an age of extinction
Fænomenologi og antropocentrisme
Can There Be Friendship Between Human Beings and Wild Animals
The European politics of animal experimentation
Democratic silence
Save the Meat for Cats
A fowl politics of urban dwelling. Or, Ybor City’s republic of noise
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |