The Language of Postwar Intellectual Schmittianism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3970202 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timo Pankakoski (0000-0002-4076-9717, University of Helsinki, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 607-627 |
| Publication date | 2018-08-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2018.1471917 |
| OpenAlex | W2804631311 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 26 |
The article analyzes the work of Hanno Kesting, Reinhart Koselleck, Roman Schnur, and Nicolaus Sombartfour young followers of Carl Schmitt in postwar Germany. Their intellectual Schmittianism was less than a full commitment to Schmitt's political positions, yet had more than an arbitrary similarity with them: it pertained to assumptions, categories, and modes of thought. Drawing on Pocock's terminology, I identify a particular language of intellectual Schmittianism, introduce its key components, and analyze their interaction. I focus on six categories derived from Schmitt's narrative of European political modernity: discrimination, historical parallels, secularization, global civil war, open/latent civil war, and category blurs. The analysis shows that these categories were interlinked argumentative devices rather than mere rhetoric and that they systematically upheld the postwar scholars' arguments. While the Schmittian language enabled the young scholars to express their political skepticism without necessarily rejecting the newly adopted institutional forms, it also constrained their choices. Linguistic resources can always be used for novel purposes, yet the dense internal structure of the language of postwar intellectual Schmittianism hindered revaluation and selective utilization. Kesting excluded, the young scholars gradually grew critical of Schmitt to varying degrees, but they never directly confronted his problematic language
Argumentative · Conceptual history · Epistemology · Linguistics · Modernity · Narrative · Parallels · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Skepticism · Sociology · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
Donoso Cortés in gesamteuropäischer Interpretation.
Briefwechsel Ernst Forsthoff - Carl Schmitt 1926-1974
Schmitt und Sombart. Der Briefwechsel von Carl Schmitt mit Nicolaus, Corina und Werner Sombart.
Demokratische Sprache zwischen Tradition und Neuanfang
Die französischen Juristen im konfessionellen Bürgerkrieg des 16. Jahrhunderts
Die Gegenkraft und ihre Geschichte
Ex Captivitate Salus. Erfahrungen der Zeit 1945/47
Gespräche in der Sicherheit des Schweigens
Carl Schmitt - Briefwechsel mit einem seiner Schüler
Denken vom Staat her
Habermas
Der Begriff des Politischen
Critique and crisis
Carl Schmitt Versus the ‘Intermediate State’
Conflict, Context, Concreteness
Carl Schmitt, Reinhart Koselleck and the foundations of history and politics
Reoccupying Secularization
The Concept of the Political
The Machiavellian Moment
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |