Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experientia and Conscientia

Two Ambiguous Concepts in Descartes's Metaphysics

Bibliographic Data

ID3970223
AuthorsAyumu Tamura (0000-0002-1249-324X, National Institute of Technology, Ibaraki College, 866 Nakane, Hitachinaka, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue5
Pages578-590
Publication date2025-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe European Legacy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10848770.2025.2491883
OpenAlexW4409708977
LanguageEN
References cited9

Descartes uses two ambiguous concepts—experientia (experience) and conscientia (consciousness/conscience)—on which he relies in the arguments that form the basis of his metaphysics, such as the cogito argument and the theory of the free will. It appears, however, that he used experientia and conscientia in a way that was unknown at the time, as shown by the French translations of the Meditations on First Philosophy and the Principles of Philosophy. But despite using these words in a sense that differed from their traditional definitions, Descartes never defined them, and interestingly, seems to have used them interchangeably. In this article, I discuss how Descartes used these words and explain why I think that prior to Cartesians like Malebranche and La Forge, Descartes had conceived the incipient idea of consciousness in the psychological sense that he conveyed by using experientia rather than conscientia. My conclusion is that, while Descartes uses conscientia in the traditional sense of (internal) testimony, which tells us about both the current and past mental states of the subject, he uses experientia in the sense of the actual performance of mental acts such as thinking and judging, which directly tells us only about the present mental state of the subject and is thus closer to our modern psychological concept of consciousness than conscientia

Epistemology · Metaphysics · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon

    Open Access•Dugald Murdoch, Gideon Manning et al.•Cambridge Descartes Lexicon•2015

  • The Philosophical Writings of Descartes

    Open Access•René Descartes, John Cottingham et al.•Philosophical Writings of Descartes•1985

  • Science, conscience, consciousness

    Open Access•Boris Hennig•History of the Human Sciences•2010

  • The Role of Experience in Descartes' Theory of Method (I)

    Ralph M Blake•The Philosophical Review•1929

  • The Role of Experience in Descartes' Theory of Method. II

    Ralph M Blake•The Philosophical Review•1929

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae