The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis
Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3970319 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth Ann Danto (0000-0001-6905-0469, Hunter College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 98-100 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2016.1237427 |
| OpenAlex | W2529251880 |
| Language | EN |
Since divorce is generally not a happy event, why does this title claim that the separation of sociology from psychoanalysis (or vice-versa) is a particularly unhappy one? Because, say Lynn Chancer
Psychoanalysis · Psychosocial · Psychotherapist · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|