Kierkegaard, Adorno, and the Socratic Individual

The relation between the individual and history is as central to the thought of Kierkegaard as it is to political philosophy as a whole. In the present age, does the individual create history or does history create the individual? These questions are also central to Theodor Adorno, who took aim at Kierkegaard for ignoring the historical and social constraints that inhibit the freedom of the individual. Adorno’s Kierkegaard offers only dogmatic faith and abstract individualism without providing any rational, liberating challenge to oppression. Yet Adorno’s interpretation of Kierkegaard is undermined by his uncritical embrace of the dualism of reason and faith as well as his celebration of Socrates as the true individual critic of power. Adorno ironically ignores Kierkegaard’s own exposure of Socratic rationalism as the fatal pathway towards accepting oppression, just as he fails to comprehend Kierkegaard’s idea of the “religious” individual as the true opponent of both religious and secular tyranny

Epistemology · Faith · Individualism · Oppression · Politics · Rationalism · SOCRATES · Socratic method · Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Political Theology and Sovereignty

• Kierkegaard's Socratic Alternative to Hegel in Fear and Trembling

  Open Access•Matthew Dinan•The Review of Politics•2021

  Add to list