On Thinking the Tragic with Adorno
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3971200 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Markku Nivalainen (0000-0002-8154-2834, University of Jyväskylä, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2016 |
| Volumen | 21 |
| Número | 7 |
| Páginas | 644-663 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2016-10-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2016.1200276 |
| OpenAlex | W2470570880 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 10 |
This article seeks to provide a template for understanding the tragic dimension of Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophy through a reading of his early collaborative work with Max Horkheimer, the Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944). While Adorno’s view has often been considered to be tragic, little has been done to reconstruct the tragic dimension of his thought. I argue that the view of the human condition, presented in the Dialectic of Enlightenment, is founded on metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical convictions that have structural similarities with the positions held by theorists and philosophers of tragedy and the tragic. Since traces of these tragic elements can be found throughout Adorno’s mature philosophy, the approach presented in this article may serve as a model for a more detailed mapping and examination of the tragic dimension of his thought in future research
Dialectic · Dimension (graph theory · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Metaphysics · Reading (process · Social science · Sociology · Tragedy (event · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |