Marx, Engels, and the Ethics of Violence in Revolt

Marx and Engels's thought—combined with the way in which it has been interpreted—has tended to militate against discussion of an ethics of violence in revolt. Along with Sorel and Fanon, their attitude towards violence is often seen simply as one where the ends justify the means and where violence in pursuit of a just society is necessarily defensible. However, we can (and should) look to certain sources within Marx and Engels for inspiration for an ethics of violence in revolt, which places emphasis on the humanizing aspects of their work, on the core ideas of freedom, moving beyond dehumanization and moving beyond violence. I argue that this approach suggests an abhorrence of any violence and can thus be combined with a pacifist-influenced approach to the ethics of violence in revolt. This is compatible with Ernst Bloch's interpretation of Marxism, which he describes as “concrete utopianism.” Classical Marxism can, then, offer fruitful pointers to an ethics of violence in political change, although Marx and Engels's texts must be used with considerable care and must be combined with the work of other thinkers, in particular those who display more explicit moral objection to violence of any kind

Dehumanization · Epistemology · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropology · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification

• The morality of violence

  Claus W Langfred, Claus Langfred et al.•International Journal of Conflict…•2025

  Add to list

• Rosa Luxemburg on revolutionary violence

  Open Access•Damian Winczewski•Studies in East European Thought•2020

  Add to list

• The Sacralization of Violence

  Open Access•James Ryan, James A Ryan•Slavic Review•2015

  Add to list