Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Escape from Saṃsāra

Schopenhauer's Opposition to the Philosophy of History

Bibliographic Data

ID3971463
AuthorsTaran Kang (Yale-NUS College, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue5
Pages484-504
Publication date2021-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe European Legacy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10848770.2021.1907895
OpenAlexW3159760830
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

As has long been recognized, Arthur Schopenhauer’s intellectual encounter with the Orient represents a departure from previous Western philosophers’ approaches to it. What has been less appreciated, however, is that this encounter also marks a pivotal moment in the modern critique of systematic philosophies of history. Since Schopenhauer doubted that there was any logic in history, either in the form of a providential plan or a rationally intelligible structure, he impugned both history’s scientific status and its significance for an understanding of the human condition. Rejecting both Christian eschatology and the modern theory of progress, he opted instead for a transhistorical perspective. This denigration of history, which had far-reaching repercussions in the latter half of the nineteenth century, must be understood in light of Schopenhauer’s engagement with non-Western philosophy. Schopenhauer’s devaluation of the significance of historical difference, in stark opposition to the philosophers of history who preceded him, contributed to his receptivity to non-Western thought; and his belief in the affinity between his own transhistorical perspective and the teachings of Hinduism and Buddhism informed his antagonism to contemporary historical narratives and theories

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Law · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy

  • Schopenhauer's Critique of Nationalism

    Open Access•Jakob Norberg•The German Quarterly•2022

  • Weltschmerz

    Frederick C Beiser•Weltschmerz•2016

  • The Influences of Eastern Thought on Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself

    Open Access•Moira Nicholls•The Cambridge Companion to…•1999

  • Eadem, sed aliter’

    Matthew Slaboch•History of European Ideas•2015

  • The Philosophy of Schopenhauer

    Diane Collinson, Bryan Magee•The Philosophical Quarterly•1984

  • Schopenhauer et l'Inde

    Lakshmi Kapani•Journal Asiatique•2002

  • Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics

    Sandra Shapshay•Reconstructing Schopenhauer's…•2018

  • India in the Mind of Germany, Schelling, Schopenhauer and Their Times

    Peter Gaeffke, Jean W Sedlar•Journal of the American Oriental…•1982

  • Schopenhauer's Philosophy of History

    Open Access•Anthony K Jensen•History and Theory•2018

  • Arthur Schopenhauer as a Critic of History

    Paul Gottfried•Journal of the History of Ideas•1975

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae