Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

God and Boscovich's Demon

Bibliographic Data

ID3971480
AuthorsBoris Kožnjak (0000-0002-3034-9292, Institute of Philosophy, Ul. Grada Vukovara 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue1
Pages39-56
Publication date2022-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe European Legacy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10848770.2021.1986278
OpenAlexW3202240049
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

From the physical, mathematical, and conceptual points of view, Roger Joseph Boscovich’s original 1758 formulation of the principle of physical determinism and Pierre-Simon Laplace’s later 1814 rendering of the principle appear identical. Both Boscovich and Laplace expressed epistemological and ontological commitments to the ideas that (a) the present state of the universe is a necessary effect of its preceding states and the immediate cause of the states that follow, and (b) that knowledge of the present state of the universe allows the full knowledge of its future and past states. However, their respective metaphysical readings of the principle of determinism radically differ. Contrary to the secularized reading of the principle given by Laplace, Boscovich’s reading of the principle strongly affirms the natural theology he inherited from Newton. In particular, in addition to enhancing the traditional teleological and cosmological arguments for the existence of God based on probability theory and his specific views of the nature of infinity, Boscovich also offered an innovative version of the cosmological argument based on the very principle of physical determinism he was the first to formulate. The purpose of this article is to analyze the content and context of these metaphysical differences between Boscovich and Laplace in respect to the principle of physical determinism, which nevertheless leave intact the scientific content of the principle

Determinism · Epistemology · Laplace transform · Metaphysics · Physical law · Physics · Teleology · Theoretical physics · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · History and Theory of Mathematics · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Roger Boscovich on Mind-Body Interaction and the Conservation of Momentum

    Boris Kožnjak•The European Legacy•2026

  • Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

    Open Access•Antonio Clericuzio, Dana Jalobeanu et al.•Encyclopedia of Early Modern…•2020

  • On the origins and foundations of Laplacian determinism

    Marij Van Strien•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Who let the demon out? Laplace and Boscovich on determinism

    Open Access•Boris Kožnjak•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Jesuit Contribution to Science

    Open Access•Agustín Udías•Jesuit Contribution to Science•2014

  • God of Gods, and Lord of Lords

    Stephen D Snobelen•Osiris•2001

  • How the Principia Got its Name; Or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously

    Open Access•Ashley Cunningham, Andrew Cunningham•History of Science•1991

  • Laplace's Early Work

    Stephen M Stigler•Isis•1978

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae