Religion in Habermas's Two-Track Political Theory
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3971503 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Adil Usturali (0000-0001-9115-2162, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Mahmutbey Mahallesi, Mahmutbey Dilmenler Caddesi No:26, 34218 Bağcılar, Istanbul, Turkey, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 566-582 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2017.1312829 |
| OpenAlex | W2616096552 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
This article argues that Habermas’s position on the relationship between religion and politics reaffirms his two-track political theory of the secular state and civic duty. His “hard-core” theory of secularism coupled with an ethics of citizenship seeks new ways of including religious citizens in modern pluralistic societies. The analysis of secularism both as a concept and as a guiding principle in Habermas’s work shows that most critics have misinterpreted his specific use of the term. The result of this is that most secularist and accommodationist critics of Habermas’s ethics of citizenship disregard his two-track political theory and its co-originality principle that assumes the equal status of public and private autonomies of citizens. My aim is thus to shift critical attention to the central aspects of Habermas’s work on religion, specifically to the task of translating religious reasons into an all-accessible language. This task of translation faces several difficulties due to some points that are left unclear by Habermas, such as determining the line separating the informal and the formal spheres, and how to avert the risk of majoritarian hijacks of democracy that could altogether undermine the Habermasian framework
Economics · Epistemology · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Religion, European secular identities, and European integration
Normal Science and its Dangers
Moral consciousness and communicative action
Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment
The European Nation State. Its Achievements and Its Limitations. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship
Secularism and State Policies toward Religion
Formations of the Secular
Notes on Post‐Secular Society
The separation of religion and politics in a post-secular society
Religion and the public sphere
Habermas, same-sex marriage and the problem of religion in public life
An Awareness of What Is Missing
A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion
Laïcité in Reverse
How Religion Speaks to the Agnostic
Religion in the Public Sphere
Religion in the Public Sphere
The Idea of Public Reason Revisited
Religion and Democracy in the Thought of Jürgen Habermas
Between Facts and Norms
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |