When research animals become pets and pets become research animals
Care, Death, and Animal Classification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3977217 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexandra Palmer (0000-0001-5273-4813, School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, corresponding author), Thomas Skidmore (0000-0001-8816-4082, University of Southampton), Alistair Anderson (0000-0003-2385-0211, University of Nottingham) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1519-1537 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social & Cultural Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9365 • E-ISSN: 1470-1197 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14649365.2022.2073465 |
| PMID | 38656701 |
| OpenAlex | W4280631771 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 36 |
This paper explores what happens to care, and decisions about ending and extending life, when research animals become pets and pets become research animals. To do this, we draw on in-depth qualitative research on (i) rehoming of laboratory animals, (ii) veterinary clinical research, and (iii) the role of the Named Veterinary Surgeon (NVS) in UK animal research. We begin by exploring how (in theory and practice) the ethical, affective, and practical elements of care are split in the research laboratory. We then investigate arguments for and against ending and extending animal life via clinical research and rehoming, highlighting how these activities bring norms and dilemmas around animal death in the laboratory and veterinary clinic to the fore. We conclude by demonstrating the value of investigating borders between animal categories for understanding dilemmas around care and death, and for contributing to emerging literatures within geography around animal care, death, and categorisation. Key contributions of our work include highlighting: how care roles can be split; the importance of considering speculative and in-practice elements of care; the context-dependency and multiplicity of practices of killing in the veterinary clinic and laboratory; and the flexibility and changing nature of animal categories
Animal life · Animal welfare · Biology · Companion animal · Context (archaeology · Flexibility (engineering · Geography · Management · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Veterinary medicine · Animal testing and alternatives · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Ecology
One R or the other – an experimental bioethics approach to 3R dilemmas in animal research
Cat egorisation of cats
Ethical Tensions in Human–Laboratory Animal Relations
Edge cases in animal research law
Animal research, ethical boundary‐work, and the geographies of veterinary expertise
Yi-Fu Tuan’s Dominance and Affection
Encountering nonhuman charisma
Between a Bird-in-the-Hand and Species Data in the Bank
Caring with abject urban animals
Death is a Welfare Issue
Perpetration-induced Traumatic Stress in Persons Who Euthanize Nonhuman Animals in Surgeries, Animal Shelters, and Laboratories
Killing with kindness
Edge cases in animal research law
Emotions and affect in recent human geography
Apparatuses of Animality
Animal Mobilegalities
Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle
Animal geographies III
Distancing animal death
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs
Negotiating Moral Value
A good life? A good death? Reconciling care and harm in animal research
Care
Mortal love
Intimate entanglements in the animal house
Nothing Comes Without Its World
Matters of care
Becoming in Kind
Captive
Care, Laboratory Beagles and Affective Utopia
Care as an Alternative to Euthanasia? Reconceptualizing Veterinary Palliative and End-of-life Care
I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |