Geography and psychoanalysis

Tensions and possibilities

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3978049
AutoresDavid Sibley (0000-0003-3951-8168, University of Hull, autor de correspondencia)
Año2003
Volumen4
Número3
Páginas391-399
Fecha de publicación2003-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial & Cultural Geography (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1464-9365 • E-ISSN: 1470-1197
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14649360309070
OpenAlexW2063075787
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas12
Referencias citadas14

I am concerned in this paper with the diversity of psychoanalysis, a feature of the discipline which we can connect with diasporas and the re-working of ideas in different locales. I try to demonstrate how experience and environment have contributed to the development of psychoanalysis. Key to the production of knowledge are the journeys of theorists, practitioners and ideas. Following Liz Bondi, I stress the importance of acknowledging the connection between experience, theory and practice in our own work. I suggest that geographers can follow those psychoanalysts who have moved from the clinic to broader political projects but that they should engage with recent critical research in psychoanalysis if a dialogue is to develop. Keywords: JourneysLocalityObject RelationsPolitical Engagement

Diversity (politics · Epistemology · Key (lock · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Work (physics · Anthropology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy · Psychology