Communicative patterns and social networks between scientists and technicians in a culture of care
Discussing Morality Across a Hierarchy of Occupational Spaces
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3978062 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nathalie Nuyts (0000-0002-0522-5212, London School of Economics and Political Science), C Friese (0000-0001-7144-8046, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 11-30 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social & Cultural Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-9365 • E-ISSN: 1470-1197 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14649365.2021.1901976 |
| PMID | 36712289 |
| OpenAlex | W3130108412 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 40 |
Communication between scientists and animal technicians is considered important for creating a 'culture of care' in facilities that use animals in scientific research. For example, the Brown report, which investigated alleged failures of animal care at Imperial College London, noted the physical and social separation between animal technicians and scientists as a problem that delimited a culture of care. This paper seeks to better understand the communicative relationships between scientists and animal technicians in this context. We conducted a survey of scientists working in the UK who use animals in their research (n = 230), asking who they spoke with about various aspects related to using animals in research. We found that scientists communicated with technicians about operational issues, while they spoke with other scientists about experimental design as well as moral questions and concerns. We probe the meaning of these communicative relationships using narrative analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews conducted with consenting survey respondents (n = 14). Analytically, this paper seeks to bridge social network analysis with geographies of care through a shared concern with relations of power
Art · Context (archaeology · Geography · Hierarchy · Humanities · Meaning (existential · Morality · Political science · Sociology · Animal testing and alternatives · Law · Psychology · Zoonotic diseases and public health
Structural Holes
Identifying sets of key players in a social network
Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks
Plastic pigs and public secrets in translational neonatology in Denmark
Animal Ethos
Brokerage and Closure
Treating pigs
Transgenic Silences
Wanted—standard guinea pigs’
Making the anaesthetised animal into a boundary object
Progress in Human Geography
Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object
Care and caring
Landscapes of care
Cultures of care? Animals and science in Britain
Exploring the Role of Animal Technologists in Implementing the 3Rs
Science, Culture, and Care in Laboratory Animal Research
"Skilled Care" and the Making of Good Science
Accounting for Animal Experiments
Of Lobsters, Laboratories, and War
Care of the body
Intimate knowledge
What is a Humanized Mouse? Remaking the Species and Spaces of Translational Medicine
Caring for the Multiple and the Multitude
Ethics, Space, and Somatic Sensibilities
Standardization through Mechanization
When 'cultures of care' meet
Spaces of care in the city
Intimate entanglements in the animal house
Captivating Behaviour
A Brave New Animal for a Brave New World
Going Into the Closet With Science
Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory
Entanglements in Health and Well-being
A life worth living
Potentializing the Research Piglet in Experimental Neonatal Research
Realizing Potential in Translational Medicine
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |