On the function and distribution of the modifiers respective and respectively

This paper deals with two cognate modifiers, respective and respectively . Despite the obvious fact that they belong to di Verent parts of speech, they have been considered to perform the same semantic function of mapping two sets of participants in a sentence, and of distributing the predicate of the sentence, in accordance with the mapping, to a number of propositions representing the subparts of the event described in that sentence. As regards their syntactic occurrences, they have been regarded as complementary in distribution. This paper endeavors to show that the two modifiers play different roles and select different domains for their notional operations, and that the syntactic complementarity claimed by many researchers is only apparent and does not obtain in every case. The important thing to note in handling the semantic function and syntactic distribution of these modifiers is their difference in syntactic category. We begin with this very basic observation, and in the course of this study, the slight morphological difference proves to be strongly connected with every aspect of the syntactic and semantic properties of the two modifiers

Atomic sentence · Complementarity (molecular biology) · Function (biology) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Notional amount · Part of speech · Predicate (mathematical logic) · Semantic role labeling · Sentence · Syntactic structure · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

• The syntax-semantics interface of ‘respective’ predication

  Open Access•Yusuke Kubota, Robert Levine et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016

  Add to list

• What is Corpus Linguistics

  Open Access•Stefan Th Grie•Language and Linguistics Compass•2009

  Add to list