Prediction in SVO and SOV languages
Processing and Typological Considerations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3988949 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul E Engelhardt (0000-0001-9699-2101, University of East Anglia), Luna Filipovic (0000-0001-9460-9797, University of California, Davis), John A Hawkins (0000-0002-2943-9397, University of California, Davis, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 349-383 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling-2022-0055 |
| OpenAlex | W4390272422 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 48 |
In this study, we tested the possibility that different word orders engender different processing preferences. Our key hypothesis was that a head-initial language like English (SVO) allows more prediction compared to a head-final language like Japanese (SOV). In Experiment 1, English and Japanese native speakers completed a cloze task in which they heard a sentence fragment (SV_ in English and SO_ in Japanese) and had to complete it with the word they thought best. We assessed cloze probability of the words produced and voice onset times. Experiment 2 examined written completions in English, in which we compared the cloze probabilities in SV_ fragments versus OS_ fragments. Following the central hypothesis, this experiment allowed us to determine (within language) whether there is more prediction from a noun and verb compared to two nouns. Finally, in Experiment 3, we compared written completions in English and Japanese, in which the stimuli given to participants were identical (SV_ in English and S_V in Japanese). Results across all three experiments were consistent with greater prediction in English. We argue that prediction is one important factor in processing, that it is relied on more in English than in Japanese, and that prediction will be especially favored in languages like English in which the verb regularly precedes its direct object
Head (geology) · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Noun · Object (grammar) · Sentence · Sentence processing · Task (project management) · Verb · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic
The extended argument dependency model
Semantic Influences On Parsing
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Linguistic complexity
Interaction with context during human sentence processing
Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Categorical data analysis
The Complex Adaptive System Principles model for bilingualism
Syntactic processing
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance
Does headedness affect processing? A new look at the VO–OV contrast
Syntactic weight vs information structure and word order variation in Polish
Headedness and the Lexicon
Head position and parsing ambiguity
Locality and Parsing Complexity
Multiple factors in second language acquisition
The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations
Dependency Theory
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |