The role of codeswitched input to children in the origin of a new mixed language
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3989557 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carmel O''Shannessy (0000-0003-4914-9693, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Carmel O'Shannessy |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling-2012-0011 |
| OpenAlex | W2326813597 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 43 |
Light Warlpiri is a mixed language, with Warlpiri and Aboriginal English/Kriol as its sources. It was developed by a group who received codeswitched input in a baby talk register from when they were young. The innovating group conventionalized the input they received and developed morphosyntactic structures beyond those in the input. The development of Light Warlpiri shows that commonly occurring processes in language contact situations, codeswitching and re-analyses of existing forms, play an important role in the extreme outcome of the development of a mixed language, through a two-part process: a) an adult group directed codeswitched speech to children, and b) the children conventionalized and expanded the morphosyntactic structures they heard. The new code is an in-group language and did not emerge in order to indicate a new dual-cultural identity, but since its development it has come to signal the identity of young Warlpiri from Lajamanu
Aesthetics · Art · Dual (grammatical number · Identity (music · Linguistics · Australian Indigenous Culture and History · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Psychology
Language mixing and genetic similarity
Birth of a contact language did not favor simplification
Loss and Renewal
The Oxford Handbook of Archaeology and Language
Australian archaeolinguistics
Sino-Tibetan archaeolinguistics
Discourse and social interaction
Noun classes
Phonotactics
Australian languages and interdisciplinary approaches to the past
It “bendy dis one”
Towards a Typology of Contact‐Induced Change
There are no language switching costs when codeswitching is frequent
From language mixing to fused lects
The road to fusion
How ordinary child language acquisition processes can lead to the unusual outcome of a mixed language
Bilingual speech in Jaru–Kriol conversations
Unevenly mixed Romani languages
Talking together
Multilingual children increase language differentiation by indexing communities of practice
Conventionalized creativity in the emergence of a mixed language – A case study of Light Warlpiri
When more is more
Code Switching and Mixed Language Genesis in Tiwi
Recycling a Mixed Language
Communities of Practice in the Warlpiri Triangle
Enduring and Contemporary Code-Switching Practices in Northern Australia
Grammaticalization, Language Contact, and the Emergence of a Hortative in Guaraché, a New Mixed Language in Paraguay
Linguistic diversity in first language acquisition research
Source language influences in the Australian mixed language, Light Warlpiri
Toward a typology of Australian contact languages
Indigenous Language Ecologies framework
From Endangerment to (Re)Emergence
Diagnosing Contact Processes from their Outcomes
Amazigh-Arabic Code-Switching in Radio Talk Shows
Can Internet Data Help to Uncover Developing Preferred Multilingual Usage Patterns? An Exploration of Data from Turkish-Dutch Bilingual Internet Fora
The longitudinal corpus of language acquisition, maintenance and contact
Acquisition or change in the comprehension of word order and case marking in Gurindji Kriol
At risk” languages and the road to recovery
The Oxford Guide to Australian Languages
The role of multiple sources in the formation of an innovative auxiliary category in Light Warlpiri, a new Australian mixed language
Is dense codeswitching complex
Distributions of case allomorphy by multilingual children
Language Endangerment in Childhood
| Citations per year | 3.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |