Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Charles Spearman and the general factor in intelligence

Genesis and interpretation in the light of sociopersonal considerations

Bibliographic Data

ID4002378
AuthorsBernard Norton, B G Norton (University of Leicester, corresponding author)
Year1979
Volume15
Issue2
Pages142-154
Publication date1979-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5061 • E-ISSN: 1520-6696
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1520-6696(197904)15:2<142::aid-jhbs2300150206>3.0.co;2-x
PMID11608231
OpenAlexW1997462890
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Interest in “intelligence” developed dramatically during the early twentieth century. Between 1900 and 1910 significant applications and theoretical moves were made, and, by 1918, the associated social technology of mass mental testing was being widely applied. Few theoretical aspects of these developments outrank Charles Spearman's production and promotion of the doctrine of g – the supposed general factor in intelligence. The theory of g has led to Spearman being compared with John Dalton, and has played a major role in attempts to explain what intelligence tests really measure. This article addresses the why and the how of Spearman's production and promotion of his conception. It is seen that the interpretation Spearman gave to his theory is broader than is generally acknowledged, and, consequently, that the “real” Spearman differed interestingly from the prototypic factor analyst that bears his name in many texts. It is argued that, for Spearman, the attractiveness of the theory resided not so much in its fit with empirical data as in its conformity to various philosophical, ethical, and social propositions which he strongly favored.

Attractiveness · Conformity · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Political science · Positive economics · Promotion (chess) · Psychoanalysis · Spearman's rank correlation coefficient · Statistics · Test (biology) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Sordid genealogies

    Open Access•Michael Wintroub•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • The origins of race psychology—I

    M Billig•Patterns of Prejudice•1982

  • Capturing minds

    Open Access•Ger Wackers, Marthe Schille-Rognmo•Theory & Psychology•2022

  • “Professor Spearman has drawn over-hasty conclusions”

    Open Access•Joel Michell•Theory & Psychology•2023

  • Does the history of psychology have a subject

    Open Access•Roger Smith•History of the Human Sciences•1988

  • The origins of race psychology—II

    M Billig•Patterns of Prejudice•1983

  • Bernard John Norton

    Open Access•William H Brock•The British Journal for the…•1985

  • The Dutch curve

    Open Access•Ernst Mulder, Frieda Heyting•Journal of the History of the…•1998

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,18
Citation span1982 - 2023 (42)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae