The role of evidence in interpretations of the scientific work of Karl Lashley
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4004438 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Donald A Dewsbury (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 255-257 |
| Publication date | 2002-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5061 • E-ISSN: 1520-6696 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jhbs.10065 |
| OpenAlex | W1969012658 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
I discuss some of the issues underlying the different perspectives of Nadine Weidman and myself on the scientific oeuvre of Karl Lashley. I emphasize that our disagreements concern the kind of evidence needed to support specific claims more than any differences in our models of science. (c) 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Cognitive science · Epistemology · Psychoanalysis · Scientific evidence · Work (physics) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Engineering · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2012 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |