Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Lithographic Conspiracy

How Satire Framed Liberal Political Debate in Nineteenth-Century France

Bibliographic Data

ID4008919
AuthorsAmy Wiese Forbes, Amy Forbes (0000-0001-6744-4675, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume26
Issue2
Publication date2008-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrench Politics Culture & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-6370 • E-ISSN: 1558-5271
PublisherBerghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3167/fpcs.2008.260203
OpenAlexW2074489241
LanguageEN

This article discusses political satire under the July Monarchy. It analyzes how the question of satire's political meaning was generated and framed in the 1830s as debate over abstract rights under the new, supposedly more liberal government of the July Monarchy. Following the Revolution of 1830, lithographic satire became connected conceptually to political conspiracy and was argued to be harmful to the new regime. State institutions, including the police, the courts, and the National Assembly, attempted to understand and define satire politically. The effort to evaluate satire's potential harm to the state shaped French liberalism into a contest between rights to free speech and protection from harm. This process was part of a broader struggle to construct legitimate authority in France

Classical liberalism · CONTEST · Epistemology · Harm · Liberalism · Monarchy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subversion · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Philosophy · Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae