Technocrats' Compromises
Defining Race and the Struggle for Equality in Brazil, 1970-2010
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4018014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brenna Marea Powell, Graziella Moraes Silva (0000-0003-3191-6022) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 87-115 |
| Publication date | 2018-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Latin American Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-216X • E-ISSN: 1469-767X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022216x17000797 |
| OpenAlex | W2743049628 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 45 |
This article focuses on census policy-making by analysing the decision-making processes behind the apparent stability of Brazilian racial categories within a context of multiple changes in racial politics and policies over the last four decades (1970-2010). Empirically, we rely on archival material, survey and census data, as well as key informant interviews with senior technocrats from the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics, IBGE). Our findings show the central role of technocratic actors in shaping and giving meaning to these categories in a context of uncertainty about the most valid approach to measurement. Their role is particularly evident in IBGE's early application of thenegrocategory to the non-white population and repeated rejection of themorenocategory. Beyond technical expertise, these census officials navigated various professional, political and ideological motivations. We develop the concept of technocratic compromise to capture census officials' decision-making process and underscore its importance to explaining census policy outcomes
Census · Compromise · Context (archaeology) · Geography · Ideology · Meaning (existential) · Political science · Politics · Population · Race (biology) · Social science · Sociology · Technocracy · Census and Population Estimation · Demography · Gender Studies · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America · Psychology · Public Administration
Reach and Retrenchment of the Environmental State
Coproduciendo Categorías étnico-raciales
Évaluer l’effet de la reclassification « raciale » dans les recensements brésiliens
Co-producing ethnoracial categories
Comparing Ideologies of Racial Mixing in Latin America
Seeing Race Like a State
Optics of the State
Seeing whites
Thicker than blood
Diploma of Whiteness
National Colors
Race and Ethnicity in Latin America
Shades of Citizenship
Hour of Eugenics
Race and Ethnicity in Latin America
Census and Identity
Explaining Institutional Change
Blackness without Ethnicity
The Making of a Counter Culture
Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa
From "Racial Democracy" to Affirmative Action
The Spectacle of Races
Sobre o uso da variável raça-cor em estudos quantitativos
Inconsistências e consequências da variável raça para a mensuração de desigualdades
Não somos racistas
State Versus Ethnic Claims
Imagined communities
Pigmentocracies
Ideological “guerrillas” and the quest for technological autonomy
The Career Connection
Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies
Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850-1930
Ethnic Classification in Global Perspective
Mobilising for pure prestige? Challenging Federal census ethnic categories in the USA (1850-1940)
The Population Census and the Construction of Identity
Cross-Field Effects and Ethnic Classification
Estimating the stability of census-based racial/ethnic classifications
Seeing Like Citizens
Desigualdades raciais e políticas públicas
Contributions of Racial-Ethnic Reclassification and Demographic Processes to Indigenous Population Resurgence
The Race to Progress
Ensaios em antropologia histórica
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Unmixing for Race Making in Brazil
Brazil in black and white? Race categories, the census, and the study of inequality
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |