Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Technics and the Nature of Man

Bibliographic Data

ID4020534
AuthorsLewis Mumford (corresponding author)
Year1966
Volume7
Issue3
Pages303
Publication date1966-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-165X • E-ISSN: 1097-3729
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3101930
OpenAlexW2334144167
LanguageEN
Citations received12

The last century, we all realize, has witnessed a radical transformation in the entire human environment, largely as a result of the impact of the mathematical and physical sciences upon technology. This shift from an empirical, tradition-bound technics to an experimental scientific mode has opened up such new realms as those of nuclear energy, supersonic transportation, cybernetic intelligence, and instantaneous planetary communication. In terms of the currently accepted picture of the relation of man to technics, our age is passing from the primeval state of man, marked by his invention of tools and weapons for the purpose of achieving mastery over the forces of nature, to a radically diifferent condition, in which he will not only have conquered nature but detached himself completely from the organic habitat. With this new megatechnics, man will create a uniform, all-enveloping structure, designed for automatic operation. Instead of functioning actively as a tool-using animal, man will become a passive, machine-serving animal whose proper functions, if this process continues unchanged, will either be fed into a machine, or strictly limited and controlled for the benefit of depersonalized collective organizations. The ultimate tendency of this development was correctly anticipated by Samuel Butler more than a century ago; but it is only now that his playful fantasy shows many signs of becoming a far-from-playful reality. My purpose in this paper is to question both the assumptions and the predictions upon which our commitment to the present form of technical and scientific progress, as an end itself, has been based. In par

History · Philosophy · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

  • The Information Society as Mega-Machine

    Christopher May•Information Communication & Society•2000

  • ICTs and Immaterial Labor From a Feminist Perspective

    Open Access•Leopoldina Fortunati•Journal of Communication Inquiry•2011

  • Human nature, the means-ends relationship, and alienation

    Open Access•Bocong Li•Technology in Society•2015

  • Liu Zeyuan's philosophy of engineering and technology

    Open Access•Qin Zhu, Carl Mitcham•Technology in Society•2020

  • Lewis Mumford's Technics and Civilization

    Rosalind Williams, Rosalind H Williams•Technology and Culture•2002

  • Remarks on Technological Progress

    Ilkka Niiniluoto•Is Science Progressive?•1984

  • La technologie de Leroi-Gourhan

    Open Access•Nathan Schlanger•Artefact•2022

  • Concevoir l’histoire des techniques en France (1950-1980)

    Open Access•Anne-Francoise Garcon•e-Phaïstos•2024

  • Curriculum Design Considerations for Technology Education

    Open Access•J A Muir Gray, James R Gray•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•1989

  • The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology

    Paul Forman•History and Technology•2007

  • Defining Technology

    Open Access•Jon Wagner, Jon C Wagner•Human Relations•1979

  • L'Outil, l'esprit et la machine

    Open Access•T Ingold•Techniques & culture•2010

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,26
Citation span1979 - 2024 (46)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae