Do Microscopes Have Politics? Gendering the Electron Microscope in Laboratory Biological Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4023730 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicola Williams (0000-0003-4709-4190, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1159-1183 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Technology and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-165X • E-ISSN: 1097-3729 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/tech.2023.a910999 |
| PMID | 38588184 |
| OpenAlex | W4388305517 |
| Language | EN |
Objects like microscopes are gendered depending on their context. The introduction of the electron microscope at Leeds University in early 1940s Britain was under the control of high-status physicists, most of whom were men, who regulated its access over and against biologists. Moreover, the microscope required physical strength more associated with men than women, combined with a sound knowledge of physics. This article explores the challenges women encountered including access to scientific instruments when entering post-World War II electron microscopy through Irene Manton's career. It combines techno-political and gendered perspectives on the history of women in science. In particular, the study invites gendered understanding of early biological electron microscopy, at a university world-renowned on the subject, through the lens of one capital intensive microscope
Context (archaeology) · Electron microscope · Microscope · Optics · Physics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Medical Research and Treatments · History · History of Science and Natural History · Law · Medical History and Innovations
| Highly cited | No |
|---|