The Young Economist's Guide to Professional Etiquette
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4029331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel S Hamermesh (0000-0001-7927-2743, Professor of Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts., corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 169-179 |
| Publication date | 1992-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965 |
| Publisher | American Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1257/jep.6.1.169 |
| OpenAlex | W2119749761 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 1 |
Nearly all advanced graduate students and new assistant professors demonstrate naivety in their nonsubstantive professional dealings. Graduate programs in economics offer courses that lead to written drafts of important research; they teach little about how to refine those drafts and, more generally, about the personal interactions that cut and polish intellectual diamonds in the rough. I provide here a short course aimed at removing that naivety and helping young economists to avoid faux pas that might reduce their success in the profession
Economics · Engineering ethics · Etiquette · Graduate students · Management · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Institutions · Engineering · Law · Medicine · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Psychology
Re-engineering scientific credit in the era of the globalized information economy
Why econometricians don't replicate (although they do reproduce)
Looking for Those Natural Numbers
Routes to Scholarly Success in Public Administration
How to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process
Facts and Myths about Refereeing
Simultaneous Multiple Journal Submissions
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1991 - 2017 (27) |
| Highly cited | No |