Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The effectiveness of UN and EU sanctions

Lessons for the Twenty-First Century

Bibliographic Data

ID4031639
AuthorsAlex Vines (Chatham House, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume88
Issue4
Pages867-877
Publication date2012-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01106.x
OpenAlexW1974463502
LanguageEN
Citations received6

A fractious UN Security Council has contributed to the decline in effectiveness of a number of UN sanctions adopted in recent years. Yet they remain a tool of the Council, for example with regard to Libya in 2011. The challenge is to understand how UN, country (US) and regional sanctions (EU, AU, Arab League) can be meaningful in such a climate. The four books reviewed make various suggestions, from clarity of mandate to better evaluating impact. Mikael Eriksson's Targeting peace seeks to evaluate the complexity of the sanctions policy process. He argues that effectiveness comes partly from understanding politics (episodes of sanctions), but also from institutional reform—‘black box’ processes, as he calls them. Sanctions are more successful as part of a wider package. Clara Portela in European Union sanctions and foreign policy examines the use of sanctions as a political tool, including the suspension of development aid and the withdrawal of trade privileges. She shows how the EU plays an important role in signalling and constraining when UN sanctions are weak. For example, informal measures like the 2003 EU decision to invite only dissidents to national day receptions in Havanna resulted in the release of detainees that it had aimed for. The high rate of success of development aid cut-off stands in sharp contrast with EU Common Foreign and Security Policy sanctions. The unintended consequence of good intentions is also highlighted by both Portela and Eriksson—Zimbabwe in particular but also Côte d'Ivoire and Iran pose similar challenges. The imposition of EU or UN sanctions is easier than reaching consensus to lift them, although events in Burma (Myanmar) in 2012 have resulted in smooth suspensions of most US and EU sanctions. All four books show that targeted sanctions cannot be seen as stand-alone measures, nor assessed in isolation. Sanctions are multi-faceted and require detailed assessment of political context, episode and institutional process

CLARITY · Economic sanctions · Economics · European union · Foreign policy · International trade · Mandate · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sanctions · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Law

  • The Design and Impacts of Individual Sanctions

    Open Access•Clara Portela, Thijs Van Laer•Politics and Governance•2022

  • The UN Security Council and Human Rights

    David P Forsythe•Journal of Human Rights•2014

  • Are European Union sanctions “targeted”

    Clara Portela•Cambridge Review of International…•2016

  • The politics of Chinese tourism in South Korea

    Wooyeal Paik•The Pacific Review•2019

  • How Russia’s war against Ukraine changed EU sanctions decision-making

    Emilia Korkea‐aho, Luigi Lonardo•Journal of European Integration•2025

  • Fighting the Hydra

    Open Access•Martin Radtke, Hyeran Jo•Journal of Peace Research•2018

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2014 - 2025 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae