The sources of China's assertiveness
The System, Domestic Politics or Leadership Preferences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4032301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nien-Chung Chang Liao (Assistant research fellow at the Institute of Political Science at Academia Sinica (IPSAS); Taipei, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 817-833 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2346.12655 |
| OpenAlex | W2473373280 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
Why has China's foreign policy become more assertive since 2009, and what is driving Beijing's foreign policy orientations? Given the significance of China's rise over the past few decades, it is surprising that this question has not been subjected to systematic analysis as well as general investigation within scholarly research. This article serves to examine the sources of China's assertiveness using a system-level, unit-level and individual-level analysis. This article first looks at system-level explanations such as state power, external threats and national interests, and then considers unit-level factors including bureaucratic competition, struggles of the elite and the surge of nationalism. However, both system-level and unit-level explanations alone fail to account for China's more assertive foreign policy. This suggests that individual factors play a major role in explaining the country's more assertive external behaviour. This is especially the case when the perceptions of the political elite are deeply embedded in the state leader's preferences. This finding can enhance our understanding of why traditional explanations, that do not incorporate the role of the state leader, may fail to predict Chinese foreign policy behaviour. To understand better the implications of China's rise, therefore, we must take into account the role of the state leadership and its impact on China's growing influence in international politics
Assertiveness · China · Political science · Politics · Globalization, Economics, and Policies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
The Chinese Economic Pivot in Central Asia and Its Implications for the Post-Karimov Re-emergence of Uzbekistan
China's Political Worldview and Chinese Exceptionalism
Pulled East. The rise of China, Europe and French security policy in the Asia-Pacific
The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia
China's Energy Diplomacy
India, Japan and the Indo-Pacific
Rising to the Challenge
Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics
The Concept of ‘Community of Common Destiny’ in China's Diplomacy
Rediscovering the Transition in China’s National Interest
China’s economic statecraft and the perceptions of its leaders
Psychology as a system component
Soft power beyond liberal democracy. Authoritarian attraction, legitimacy and diffusion
Determining the Determinants
The Socialization of China’s Assertiveness
China’s Assertive Relational Strategies
The EU's China Strategies
PRC Assertiveness in the South China Sea
China’s Expanding Footprint in South Asia
What drives the Sino-Russian partnership? Regime insecurity, aggressive overreach, and authoritarian great power alignment
Multiple Shades of China's Taiwan Policy after the 19th Party Congress
Winds of Change
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |