Military command in the last decade
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4032312 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony King (0000-0002-8131-396X, University of Exeter, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 377-396 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.00978.x |
| OpenAlex | W2064346790 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
On 11 September 2010, the United States commemorated the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. In those nine years, British forces have been engaged in military operations of unexpected location, intensity, scale and duration. While the performance of British troops has been repeatedly praised on these operations, there has been growing disquiet among commentators and, indeed, among the military establishment itself about the conduct of these campaigns. Specifically, the issue of British military command has come under increasing scrutiny. This article examines command frictions at the strategic and operational levels and seeks to provide a sociological explanation of these difficulties. It claims that British commanders have failed to identify a coherent strategy over the past decade while in-theatre operational command has often been characterized by an ad hoc-ery, incoherence and inconsistency. The article suggests that a 'laissez faire' command culture has been evident at strategic and operational levels. While individual mistakes may not be irrelevant, the article explores the way in which this command culture may be a product of institutional pressures within defence and, above all, a product of inter-service rivalry. However, the laissez faire system of command in the armed forces may also be a reflection of much deeper cultural presumptions and preferences within British professional society itself which has always had a strong tendency towards pragmatism, decentralization and shorttermism. The article concludes by offering some suggestions as to how military command might be reformed in light of its potentially profound cultural origins
Command and control · Decentralization · Economics · Epistemology · Political economy · Political science · Pragmatism · Rivalry · Scrutiny · Sociology · Engineering · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Military History and Strategy · Military, Security, and Education Studies
A Grand Strategic Error’
The Baha Mousa Tragedy
A Very British National Security State
British and American military operations in the Battle of Helmand, 2006–2011
Political violence within army barracks
Allies at War
Narrative Misdirection? UK Strategic Communication for Afghanistan and Beyond
Frock Coats against Brass Hats? Politicians, the Military and the War in Afghanistan 2001–2014
Enmeshed in insurgency
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |