France's new nuclear doctrine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4032615 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David S Yost (United Nations, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 701-721 |
| Publication date | 2006-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00564.x |
| OpenAlex | W2087663469 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
The new nuclear deterrence doctrine announced by President Jacques Chirac in January 2006 has rightly been recognized as ground-breaking and potentially momentous in its implications, although in fact several of the key changes in policy had already been set out in a speech he made in June 2001.1 While France remains determined to deter threats from major powers, its main new preoccupation is deterring regional powers by making clear that it has developed more employable nuclear options. This article reviews the innovations in French doctrine, examines factors that may have contributed to the speech’s timing, and considers some implications of the new strategy
Alliance · Deterrence theory · Doctrine · Economics · International peace · International relations · International security · Library science · Management · Nuclear weapon · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
History and Foreign Policy in France and Germany
The European Fifth Republic
French nuclear idiosyncrasy
The role of ideas in EU responses to international crises
La simetría en la asociación estratégica República Popular China-Unión Europea
Nato and the anticipatory use of force
Do nuclear weapons affect the guns-butter trade-off? Evidence on nuclear substitution from Pakistan and beyond
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.37 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2015 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |