Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The promise of pillar II

Analysing international assistance under the Responsibility to Protect

Bibliographic Data

ID4034972
AuthorsAdrian Gallagher (0000-0002-2625-7715, Associate Professor in International Security at the University of Leeds., corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume91
Issue6
Pages1259-1275
Publication date2015-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1468-2346.12459
OpenAlexW2103778338
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited4

In the lead up to the 10th anniversary of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) agreement, pillar II (which refers to international assistance with state consent) was heralded by the United Nations Special Advisor on R2P as the most promising aspect of the Responsibility to Protect. With so little written on pillar II, however, it is difficult to evaluate this judgement. Addressing this lacuna, this article scrutinizes the promise of pillar II to highlight two key strengths. First, the consensual support for pillar II among UN member states reveals that even those that were critical of the R2P in the aftermath of Libya in 2011 still favour the idea of international assistance. At the same time, there remain concerns over the use of force within pillar II as illustrated by events in Côte d'Ivoire in 2011. Second, the utility of pillar II lies in its potential for addressing the threat posed by non-state armed groups. This is particularly important when one considers that in thirteen of the fourteen years since 2000, rebel groups (rather than governments) have been the primary perpetrators of one-sided mass killing against civilians. Accordingly, pillar II can be seen to hold considerable promise for tackling the threat of mass violence by non-state armed groups in the twenty-first century. However, the article also raises concerns over unintentionally legitimizing illegitimate governments through assistance. To illustrate these points it draws on the assistance provided in Mali (2013–15) and Iraq (2014–15)

Criminology · International law · Judgement · Law and economics · Pillar · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · State (computer science) · Computer Science · Engineering · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security

  • Post-Intervention Reconstruction and the Responsibility to Rebuild

    Open Access•Athanasios Stathopoulos•Social Sciences•2022

  • Redefining the status quo state

    Open Access•Petar Popović•International Politics•2024

  • Utopian in the Right Sense”

    Open Access•Aidan Hehir•Ethics & International Affairs•2017

  • Norm modification and the responsibility to protect

    Open Access•Thomas Peak•Global Policy•2025

  • When responsibility to protect ‘hits home’

    Stefania Panebianco, Iole Fontana•Third World Quarterly•2018

  • Russian Strategic Narratives on R2P in the ‘Near Abroad’

    Open Access•Juris Pupcenoks, Eric James Seltzer•Nationalities Papers•2021

  • Legitimacy in International Society

    Open Access•Isao Miyaoka•Legitimacy Internat Society•2004

  • Legitimacy faultlines in international society

    Open Access•Jason Ralph, Adrian Gallagher•Review of International Studies•2015

  • Briefing

    Olly Owens, Olly Owen et al.•African Affairs•2015

  • The fall of a donor darling

    Open Access•Isaline Bergamaschi•The Journal of Modern African…•2014

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0.67
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae