Globalization, deglobalization and Great Power politics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4034975 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Norrin M Ripsman (0009-0004-2109-5990, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1317-1333 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiab091 |
| OpenAlex | W3198050949 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 24 |
Commercial liberalism would suggest that whereas globalization was conducive to great power cooperation-or at least moderated competition-deglobalization is likely to ignite greater competition amongst the Great Powers. In reality, however, the picture is much more complex. To begin with, the intense globalization of the 1990s and 2000s is not responsible for moderating Great Power tensions; instead, it is itself a product of the security situation resulting from the end of the Cold War. Furthermore, while globalization did serve to reinforce cooperation between the United States and rising challengers, such as China, which sought to harness the economic gains of globalization to accelerate their rise, it also created or intensified fault-lines that have led to heightening tensions between the Great Powers. Finally, while we are currently witnessing increasing tensions between the US and both China and Russia, deglobalization does not appear to be the primary cause. Thus, geoeconomic conditions do not drive security relations; instead, the geoeconomic environment, which is itself influenced by Great Power politics, is better understood as a medium of Great Power competition, which may affect the character of Great Power competition and its intensity, but does not determine it
China · Competition (biology) · Development economics · Economic globalization · Economic system · Economics · Globalization · Great power · International trade · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Globalization, Economics, and Policies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
The perils of illiberal hegemony
Globalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order
A wartime olympics
Clash of the Titans
Between economic openness and strategic caution
A battery bonanza for the global South? Prospects for economic upgrading in lithium-ion battery value chains in the context of strategic capitalism
A comparative review of material supply chains and sustainability pathways in steel and battery technologies
Six paths of Global China
China’s role conflict in norm contestations
Cultivating linguacultural competence in business english communication
Emergence of deglobalized tourist segments
What sustains flawed indicators? Unpacking the EU's administrative burden agenda
Navigating the Legacy-Legitimacy Dilemma
The Post-War Evolution of Globalisation and International Order
The geopolitics of history
Of Canaries and Ropes
Gorbachev’s Revolution, 1985–1991
Populism and the economics of globalization
The Political Economy of the Globalization Backlash
China’s Path to Great Power Status in the Globalization Era
Russia, China and a Multipolar World Order
Crisis and Contention in Europe
New Thinking and New Foreign Policy Under Gorbachev
A ‘pivot’ that never existed
Transnational Liberalism and U.S. Primacy
A legacy of conflict
Troubled triangle
Troubled Triangle
The Nato Alliance And the INF Treaty
Same Bed, Different Dreams
Crashed
Rising titans, falling giants
Russia and China
The Back Channel
Coalitions of Contention
Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation
Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order
About Face
Reluctant allies
Focus On
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |