Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Maintaining transatlantic strategic, operational and tactical interoperability in an era of austerity

Bibliographic Data

ID4035480
AuthorsJohn R Deni (Research Professor of Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental and Multinational Security Studies at the Strategic Studies Institute, part of the US Army War College., corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume90
Issue3
Pages583-600
Publication date2014-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1468-2346.12128
OpenAlexW2084804319
LanguageEN
Citations received8

With the end of major combat operations in Afghanistan, how will the North Atlantic alliance maintain the unprecedented levels of interoperability developed over the last decade? One of the most effective means of building and maintaining interoperability—the forward-based presence of US military forces in Europe— has shrunk significantly over the last 25 years and is likely to shrink further in the coming years, meaning it will become increasingly difficult for American and European military forces to operate side by side. Nevertheless, the United States continues to look to its allies in NATO as the primary partners in maintaining and promoting common interests around the globe. Additionally, Washington seems more committed than ever to wielding force in a coalition context. In order to help remedy this seeming incongruity, Washington announced in early 2012 a plan to deploy rotationally several hundred troops from the United States to Germany for periodic exercises with European partners and allies. However, it remains unclear whether a rotational model will be sufficient to generate the level of interoperability necessary for US forces and those of its most capable European allies to work seamlessly across the range of military operations. The loss of tactical and operational interoperability threatens transatlantic strategic interoperability, and therefore risks decoupling European and American security policy. To mitigate these challenges, the article discusses several policy steps the United States should consider

Alliance · Austerity · Business · Context (archaeology) · Geography · International trade · Interoperability · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Military Strategy and Technology · Public Administration

  • The socialization of military power

    Derrick V Frazier, J Wesley Hutto•Defence Studies•2017

  • Nato's new front

    Open Access•Maria Mälksoo•International Affairs•2024

  • Multinational Military Exercises, the US Combatant Command System, and the Assembling of the American Security Order

    Open Access•Sebastian M Schmidt•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Epilogue

    Open Access•Adrian Hyde‐price•Global Affairs•2018

  • The United States as the Reluctant Ally

    Magnus Petersson•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2016

  • Weapon of choice

    Open Access•Lorenzo Cladi, A Locatelli•Contemporary Italian Politics•2023

  • A Knowledge Taxonomy for Military Interoperability

    Open Access•Matías Ferreyra•Armed Forces & Society•2025

  • Producing the military urban(s)

    Open Access•Anna Danielsson•Political Geography•2022

Citations per year0.8
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae