George W. Bush, Idealist
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4037166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Mazarr (0009-0002-5768-7344, Georgetown University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 503-522 |
| Publication date | 2003-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2346.00319 |
| OpenAlex | W2065331732 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
There is much anger and confused grumbling these days outside the United States—and in Europe in particular—about the character of the Bush administration's foreign policy. Perceived American unilateralism is raising hackles and questions. This article contends that current trends in US foreign policy can be better understood by realizing that many senior Bush administration officials are not ‘realists’, at least as that philosophy of world politics is classically understood. Many of the resulting views—that, for example, threats to security often originate in ideology rather than material strength—are demonstrably correct and even hopeful in their faith in long-term historical trends. But there may be no getting around the essential contradictions required of US foreign policy in an age when America is the leading power, when a new global community of trading democracies is emerging, and yet when a number of distinctly old-style threats to the peace remain very much in evidence. Washington could do more to smooth the edges of those contradictions in order to point up the idealism and hopefulness of US policy
Administration (probate law) · Alliance · Epistemology · Faith · Foreign policy · Idealism · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Unilateralism · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy
What difference does difference make? Reflections on neo- conservatism as a liberal cosmopolitan project
Unipolarity
Explaining George W. Bush's Adoption of the Neoconservative Agenda after 9/11
What Are We Debating? IR Theory between Empire and the ‘Responsible’ Hegemon
Utopianism and the Bush foreign policy
Inter-Texual Relations
Religion and Foreign Policy Making in the USA, India and Iran
America as a European power
Stability and Change in Belief Systems
The EU's Interpretation of the ‘Arab Uprisings
What is the National Interest? The Neoconservative Challenge in IR Theory
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2004 - 2014 (11) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |