Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Institutionalization, path dependence and the persistence of the Anglo-American special relationship

Bibliographic Data

ID4037256
AuthorsRuike Xu (0000-0002-2249-5951, Lecturer in the School of English and International Studies at the Beijing Foreign Studies University; China, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume92
Issue5
Pages1207-1228
Publication date2016-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/1468-2346.12705
OpenAlexW2507877423
LanguageEN
Citations received6

One of the remarkable phenomena in post-Cold War world politics is the persistence of the Anglo-American special relationship (AASR) in spite of recurrent announcement of its death by pessimists. Current scholarship on Anglo-American relations largely draws on interests and sentiments to explain the persistence of the AASR, ignoring other important contributing factors such as institutionalization. This article is the first to give serious consideration to the role of institutionalization in influencing the persistence of the AASR. By using the concept of path dependence, this article argues that the high-level institutionalization in Anglo-American intelligence, nuclear and military relations plays a seminal role in contributing to the persistence of the AASR in the post-Cold War era. The institutionalized intelligence relationship is exemplified by the relationship between the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and the US's National Security Agency (NSA), which is underpinned by the UKUSA Agreement. The institutionalized nuclear relationship is exemplified by a variety of Joint Working Groups (JOWOGs), which is underpinned by the 1958 Mutual Defence Agreement. The institutionalized military relationship is exemplified by routinized military personnel exchange programmes, regular joint training exercises and an extremely close defence trade partnership. The high-level institutionalization embeds habits of cooperation, solidifies interdependence and consolidates mutual trust between the UK and the US in their cooperation on intelligence, nuclear and military issues

Agency (philosophy) · General partnership · Government (linguistics) · Institutionalisation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • Beyond Values and Interests

    Open Access•Justin Gibbins, Shaghayegh Rostampour•Open Journal of Political Science•2018

  • Poodle no more

    Open Access•Rachel Moreland•Journal of Transatlantic Studies•2026

  • British strategy and outer space

    Open Access•Bleddyn E Bowen•The British Journal of Politics…•2018

  • The Anglo-American military relationship

    Wyn Rees, Lance Davies•Arms Control•2019

  • What ‘special relationship'? How the state department's intervention in Northern Ireland 2003–2007 strained the Anglo-American alliance

    Open Access•Richard Hargy•Irish Political Studies•2022

  • Vicarious Identity in International Relations

    Christopher S Browning, Pertti Joenniemi et al.•Vicarious Identity in International…•2021

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae