Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Untangling the Roots of Dependency

Choctaw Economics, 1700-1860

Bibliographic Data

ID4038853
AuthorsStephen P Van Hoak (corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume23
Issue3/4
Pages113
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Indian Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-182X • E-ISSN: 1534-1828
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1185831
OpenAlexW2333910927
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

The Roots of Dependency, published in 1983, was a groundbreaking interdisciplinary examination of Euro-American-Indian cultural contact and its disastrous effects on Native Americans. Focusing on the Choctaws, Pawnees, and Navajos, Richard White attempted to identify and isolate the various factors that contributed to the material decline of American Indian peoples. Roots of Dependency was widely acclaimed when it was first published, both for White's strong thesis and his new approach to Native American history. White's methodology differed from that of traditional historians most notably in his interdisciplinary approach and in his incorporation of a Native American focus and perspective into his narrative.' White began his study by examining the Mississippi Choctaw of the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, showing how their initial adaptations to Euro-American influences eventually turned to disaster. As Euro-American forces penetrated their economy, the Choctaws driven to overhunt deer populations to extinction and in the process destroyed their resources, environment, and economy. Although he also cited alcohol as a major element of this decline, White asserted that the Euro-American economy was the critical factor in understanding the fate of the Choctaws. White claimed that the Choctaws were lured into the market by liquor, that the subsequent exchanges were literally dictated by whites, and that ultimatelycommerce ... left them hungry and vulnerable. White further asserted that Choctaw resistance was rendered utterly superfluous and that their actions served only to slow the destructive consequences of the economy. By the 1770s, according to White, the Choctaws had become dependent upon Euro-Americans to adequately feed and clothe themselves.2

Dependency (UML · Economics · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Computer Science · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History

  • Del otro lado

    Open Access•Sebastián Leandro Alioto•Revista de História•2016

  • Cumulative Index, volumes 22-25 (1998-2001)

    Mary H Best•The American Indian Quarterly•2002

  • Horses and the Economy and Culture of the Choctaw Indians, 1690-1840

    Jennifer Carson, James Taylor Carson•Ethnohistory•1995

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,08
Citation span2002 - 2016 (15)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae